Home > Issues
> Questions Regarding the LDS Church (Mormons)
Questions
Regarding
The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-Day Saints (Mormons)
by Daniel Newby,
May 26, 2005
Foreword: As primary sources, I attempt
to rely upon those accepted by the LDS church and its members,
and that can be found with relative ease. I have also tried to
keep opinion to a minimum. I do believe that
it is both healthy and essential to publicly challenge and rigorously
debate all religious philosophies, claims, and assertions.
If you do not concur with this belief, then you are probably
not ready to read this.
Topics:
PART I: Questions of
Legitimacy
Scriptural Alterations
Multiple Wives
Spiritual Gifts
The Book of Mormon
The Name of the Church
Objective LDS History
PART
II: Questions of Loyalty & Trust
Loyalty to Mortals
Loyalty to an Organization
PART
III: Questions of Authority
Melchizedek/Aaronic Priesthoods
Offices
Baptism
PART IV: Questions of
Occult Relationships
Masonic &
LDS Temple Origins
Blood/Penal
Oaths
Masters
& Titles
Clothing
Work for
the Dead
PART V:
Questions of Moral Character
Boasting
Honors of Men
PART I: Questions of Legitimacy
Scriptural Alterations
We will provide two of many examples of the
type of alterations found throughout LDS scriptural and
historical records. Following each passage, we will
attempt to ask one or more questions from the perspective of
someone seeking truth and consistency.
The first example is found in Doctrine and Covenants,
Section 10, which discusses Joseph Smith's loss of
many transcribed pages from the Book of Mormon. The words in bold strikethrough
were deleted from the original version of this account found
in the Book of Commandments published in 1833. The
words in red bold
underline were added to the 1835 Doctrine
and Covenants (a few minor changes were made in later
translations):
-
"NOW, behold I say unto you, that because you
have delivered up so many
those
writings, which you had power
given unto you
to translate by
the means of the Urim and Thummim, into the
hands of a wicked man, you have lost them,
. and you also lost your gift at the same time,
and your mind
became darkened. nevertheless it has
been is
now restored unto you again: therefore, see
that you are faithful and go
continue
on unto the finishing of the remainder of the work
of translation
as you have begun. Do not run faster
or labor more
than you have strength and means provided
to enable you
to translate, but be diligent unto the end.
Pray always, that you may come off conquerer;
yea, that you may conquer Satan, and those
that you may
escape the hands of the servants of Satan
that do uphold his work.
-
"Behold they have sought to destroy you; yea,
even the man in whom you have trusted,
has sought to
destroy you. and for this cause I said, that
he is a wicked man, for he has sought to take away the
things wherewith you have been intrusted
entrusted;
and he has also sought to destroy your gift, and because you
have delivered the writings into his hands, behold
they
wicked men have taken them from you:
therefore, you have delivered them up; yea, that which was
sacred unto wickedness. And behold, Satan has
hath
put it into their hearts to alter the words which you have
caused to be written, or which you have translated, which
have gone out of your hands; and behold I say unto you, that
because they have altered the words, they read contrary from
that which you translated and caused to be written; and on
this wise the devil has sought to lay a cunning plan, that
he may destroy this work; for he has
hath
put it into their hearts to do this, that by
lying they may say they have caught you in the words which
you have
pretended to translate.
-
"Verily I say unto you, that I will not
suffer that Satan shall accomplish his evil design in this
thing, for behold he has put it into their hearts
to get thee
to tempt the Lord their
thy
God, in asking to
translate it over again; for
And then,
behold they say
and think in their hearts, We will see if God
has given him power to translate, if so, he will also give
him power again; and if God giveth him power again, or if he
translate
translates again, or in other words, if
he bringeth forth the same words, behold we have the same
with us, and we have altered them: Therefore, they will not
agree, and we will say that he has lied in his words, and
that he has no gift, and that he has no power: therefore, we
will destroy him, and also the work, and we will do this
that we may not be ashamed in the end, and that we may get
glory of the world.
-
"Verily, verily I say unto you, that Satan
has great hold upon their hearts; he stirreth them up to
do
iniquity against that which is good,
And their hearts
are corrupt, and full of wickedness and abominations; and
they love darkness rather than light, because their deeds
are evil; therefore they will not ask of me. Satan stirreth
them up, that he may lead their souls to
destruction, and thus he has laid a cunning plan,
thinking
to destroy the work of God;
but I will
require this at their hands, and it shall turn to their
shame and condemnation in the day of judgment.
yea, he stirreth up their hearts to anger against the
this
work; yea, he saith unto them, Deceive and lie in wait to
catch, that ye may destroy: behold this is no harm, and thus
he flattereth them and telleth them that it is no sin to
lie, that they may catch a man in a lie, that they may
destroy him, and thus he flattereth them, and leadeth them
along until he draggeth their souls down to hell; and thus
he causeth them to catch themselves in their own snare; and
thus he goeth up and down, to and fro in the earth, seeking
to destroy the souls of men.
-
"Verily, verily I say unto you, wo be unto
him that lieth to deceive, because he supposeth that another
lieth to deceive, for such are not exempt from the justice
of God. Now, behold they have altered those
these
words, because Satan saith unto them, He hath deceived you,
and thus he flattereth them away to do iniquity,
to get thee
to tempt the Lord their
thy
God.
-
"Behold I say unto you, that you shall not
translate again those words which have gone forth out of
your hands; for behold, they shall not lie any more
accomplish their
evil designs in lying against those words;
for behold, if you should bring forth the same words, they
would
will say that you have lied;
and
that you have pretended to translate, but that you have
contradicted your words
yourself;
and behold they would
will
publish this, and Satan would
will
harden the hearts of the people, to stir them up to anger
against you, that they might
will
not believe my words: thus Satan would
thinketh to
overpower your
testimony in this generation, that the work
might
may not come forth in this generation: but
behold here is wisdom, and because I show unto you wisdom,
and give you commandments concerning these things, what you
shall do, show it not unto the world until you have
accomplished the work
of translation." (Book of
Commandments 9:1-7 and Doctrine and Covenants
10:1-34. Unfortunately, the Book of Commandments
appears to only be found on anti-LDS websites. The following
site appears to be the most innocuous, at least in
presenting the book:
http://www.2think.org/hundredsheep/boc/boc_main.shtml)
Questions:
Again, the above passage purports to contain a direct revelation from
God, and discusses the loss of 116 pages of the first
translation Joseph Smith attempted. God appears to be
telling Joseph Smith that they cannot re-translate and
re-publish these same 116 pages because, in essence, those who
captured those pages would alter the original and cast doubt
upon God and his work.
Yet, if God is so particular about having his
words altered, why do some of these revisions significantly alter this
very revelation?
In other words, why would God be so concerned about how his
enemies would alter his words, and how that might look to the
world, when his servants were also altering his words?
|
The second example is Book of
Commandments, Section 4:5-6, wherein God purportedly
stated the following:
-
"And thus, if the people of this generation
harden not their hearts, I will work a reformation among
them, and I will put down all lyings, and deceivings, and
priestcrafts, and envyings, and strifes, and idolatries, and
sorceries, and all manner of iniquities, and I will
establish my church, like unto the church which was taught
by my disciples in the days of old.
-
"And now if this generation do harden their
hearts against my word, behold, I will deliver them up unto
Satan, for he reigneth and hath much power at this time, for
he hath got great hold upon the hearts of the people of this
generation; and not far from the iniquities of Sodom and
Gomorrah, do they come at this time; and behold the sword of
justice hangeth over their heads, and if they persist in the
hardness of their hearts, the time cometh that it must fall
upon them...."
These verses were permanently removed in the
1835 Doctrine and Covenants without any clear
explanation.
Questions:
Is it reasonable to believe that God, without any explanation,
would take such a warning out of his word, which had already
been shared with the world? Would not such significant
deletions and alterations illicit confusion and even charges
of fraud and tampering from those seeking consistency and
truth?
|
Back to Topics
Multiple Wives
The Book of Mormon states:
-
"For behold, thus saith the Lord: This people
begin to wax in iniquity; they understand not the
scriptures, for they seek to excuse themselves in committing
whoredoms, because of the things which were written
concerning David, and Solomon his son. Behold, David and
Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was
abominable before me, saith the Lord. Wherefore, thus
saith the Lord, I have led this people forth out of the land
of Jerusalem, by the power of mine arm, that I might raise
up unto me a righteous branch from the fruit of the loins of
Joseph. Wherefore, I the Lord God will not suffer that this
people shall do like unto them of old. Wherefore, my
brethren, hear me, and hearken to the word of the Lord: For
there shall not any man among you have save it be one wife;
and concubines he shall have none; For I, the Lord God,
delight in the chastity of women. And whoredoms are an
abomination before me; thus saith the Lord of Hosts.
Wherefore, this people shall keep my commandments, saith the
Lord of Hosts, or cursed be the land for their sakes. For if
I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me, I
will command my people; otherwise they shall hearken unto
these things. For behold, I, the Lord, have seen the
sorrow, and heard the mourning of the daughters of my people
in the land of Jerusalem, yea, and in all the lands of my
people, because of the wickedness and abominations of their
husbands. And I will not suffer, saith the Lord of Hosts,
that the cries of the fair daughters of this people, which I
have led out of the land of Jerusalem, shall come up unto me
against the men of my people, saith the Lord of Hosts. For
they shall not lead away captive the daughters of my people
because of their tenderness, save I shall visit them with a
sore curse, even unto destruction; for they shall not commit
whoredoms, like unto them of old, saith the Lord of Hosts."
(Jacob
2:22-33, bold added)
Joseph Smith introduced the doctrine of
polygamy as follows:
-
"Verily, thus saith the Lord unto you my
servant Joseph, that inasmuch as you have inquired of my
hand to know and understand wherein I, the Lord, justified
my servants Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as also Moses,
David and Solomon, my servants, as touching the principle
and doctrine of their having many wives and concubines...
David also received many wives and concubines, and also
Solomon and Moses my servants, as also many
others of my servants, from the beginning of creation until
this time; and in nothing did they sin save in those things
which they received not of me... David's wives and
concubines were given unto him of me, by the hand of
Nathan, my servant, and others of the prophets who had the
keys of this power; and in none of these things did he
sin against me save in the case of Uriah and his wife;
and, therefore he hath fallen from his exaltation, and
received his portion; and he shall not inherit them out of
the world, for I gave them unto another, saith the Lord."
(Doctrine and Covenants
132:1,38-39, bold added)
Questions:
Were David and Solomon abominable for taking multiple wives as
the Book of Mormon appears to state, or were they given
multiple wives by God as the Doctrine and Covenants appears to
state?
One hypothetical justification for this
apparent discrepancy is that, when the Lord told Jacob:
"Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and
concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith the
Lord," he was only referring to the wives the Lord did not
give David and Solomon (including perhaps the
case of Uriah, where David committed adultery and murder).
But is it reasonable to assume that God is such
a poor communicator that he would overlook such details and
potential confusion when teaching such a core doctrine?
Again, as mentioned previously, God purportedly went to great
lengths to avoid potential issues regarding the transcribed
pages Joseph Smith lost.
|
To continue, the header for Doctrine and
Covenants,
Section 132, states:
-
"... Although the revelation was recorded in
1843, it is evident from the historical records that the
doctrines and principles involved in this revelation had
been known by the Prophet since 1831."
LDS President Joseph F. Smith also claimed
that:
-
"The great and glorious principle of plural
marriage was first revealed to Joseph Smith in 1831, but
being forbidden to make it public, or to teach it as a
doctrine of the Gospel, at that time, he confided the facts
to only a very few of his intimate associates." — Joseph F.
Smith, Deseret News, May 20, 1886
Yet, this admission appears to contradict a
purported revelation given in 1831 and published in the
aforementioned Book of Commandments in 1833:
-
"And again, I say unto you, that whoso
forbiddeth to marry, is not ordained of God, for marriage is
ordained of God unto man: Wherefore it is lawful that he
should have one wife, and they twain shall be one
flesh, and all this that the earth might answer the end of
its creation; and that it might be filled with the measure
of man, according to his creation before the world was
made." — Book of Commandments 52:16-17
Questions:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would indicate one wife
for every man when his servants were taking multiple wives?
Would he not be more clear so as to avoid confusion and claims
of illegitimacy?
|
Next, consider
verses 1-3 of Section 132:
-
"VERILY, thus saith the Lord unto you my
servant Joseph, that inasmuch as you have inquired of
my hand to know and understand wherein I, the Lord,
justified my servants Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as also
Moses, David and Solomon, my servants, as touching the
principle and doctrine of their having many wives and
concubines... Behold, and lo, I am the Lord thy God, and
will answer thee as touching this matter. Therefore, prepare
thy heart to receive and obey the instructions which I am
about to give unto you; for all those who have this law
revealed unto them must obey the same." [bold added]
Now examine
verses 51-52:
-
"Verily, I say unto you: A commandment I give
unto mine handmaid, Emma Smith, your wife, whom I have given
unto you, that she stay herself and partake not of that
which I commanded you to offer unto her; for I did it, saith
the Lord, to prove you all, as I did Abraham, and that I
might require an offering at your hand, by covenant and
sacrifice. And let mine handmaid, Emma Smith, receive all
those that have been given unto my servant Joseph, and
who are virtuous and pure before me; and those who are not
pure, and have said they were pure, shall be destroyed,
saith the Lord God." [bold added]
Joseph Smith apparently inquired to know God's
stand on polygamy after he had already taken other
wives. Yet, the Book of Mormon appears to assert that
no one is to take more than one wife unless the Lord first
commands them to do so:
-
"For if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts,
raise up seed unto me, I will command my people; otherwise
they shall hearken unto these things." (Jacob
2:30)
Question:
Why would God command his servant to seek permission to
practice plural marriage and then ignore the fact that
permission had not been sought prior to taking additional
wives?
Note: Also, early LDS
church leaders had many wives, and yet there was never a
command recorded, either in Doctrine and Covenants 132 or
elsewhere, to "raise up seed," as per the Book of Mormon's
purported purpose for this practice.
|
In addition,
Section 132 was not included in the Doctrine and
Covenants until 1876, and was not widely circulated until
long after Joseph Smith's death in 1844.
Question:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would hide Section 132
from the world, particularly when observers were wondering why
his servants were taking multiple wives without any
explanation? |
An "Article of Marriage" was added to the 1835
version of the Doctrine and Covenants, however. This article
was deleted in the same year that section 132 was added. Here
is part of that original "Article on Marriage":
-
"Inasmuch as this Church of Christ has been
reproached with the crime of fornication and polygamy, we
declare that we believe that one man should have one
wife, and one woman but one husband, except in
case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again."
[bold and underline added]
The word "but" appears to possibly be
significant as it appears in the case of the woman's partner(s),
but not in the case of the man's partner(s).
Questions:
Would God phrase such a document in this fashion if his
followers were indeed already taking more than one wife?
Would not those seeking consistency and truth be discouraged
to read a document such as this and thereafter learn that LDS
leaders were already taking multiple wives?
|
Other declarations are equally puzzling:
-
"Do the Mormons believe in having more
wives than one? No, not at the same time. But they
believe that if their companion dies, they have a right to
marry again. But we do disapprove of the custom, which has
gained in the world, and has been practiced among us, to our
great mortification, in marrying in five or six weeks, or
even in two or three months, after the death of their
companion. We believe that due respect ought to be had to
the memory of the dead, and the feelings of both friends and
children." — Joseph Smith, History of the Church,
vol. 3, p. 28, see also Elder's Journal, cited in
vol. I, no. II, pp 28-29, bold added).
Consider this public notice in the Times and
Seasons 5:3:423, apparently written after Doctrine and
Covenants
132
was given:
"TIMES AND SEASONS. CITY OF NAUVOO, THURSDAY,
FEBRUARY 1, 1844. NOTICE.
-
"As we have lately been credibly informed,
that an Elder of the Church of Jesus Christ, of Latter day
Saints, by the name of Hiram Brown, has been preaching
Polygamy, and other false and corrupt doctrines, in
the county of Lapeer, state of Michigan.
-
"This is to notify him and the Church in
general, that he has been cut off from the church, for his
iniquity; and he is further notified to appear at the
Special Conference, on the 6th of April next, to make answer
to these charges.
-
"JOSEPH SMITH,
HYRUM SMITH,
Presidents of said Church." [bold added]
Here are additional examples:
-
"CERTIFICATES OF WILLIAM AND HENRY MARKS.
Inasmuch as John C. Bennett has called upon me through the
Sangamo Journal to come out and confirm the statements which
he has made concerning Joseph Smith and others, I take this
opportunity of saying to the public, that I know many of his
statements to be false, and that I believe them all to be
the to be the offspring of a base and corrupt heart, and
without the least shadow of truth, and further that he has
used my name without my permission. I believe him to be a
vile and wicked adulterous man, who pays no regard to the
principles of truth or righteousness, and is unworthy the
confidence of a just community. I would further state
that I know of no Order in the Church which admits of a
plurality of wives, and do not believe that Joseph Smith
ever taught such a doctrine, and further, that my faith
in the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints, and in Joseph Smith, is unshaken." — William Marks,
given in Nauvoo on July 26, 1842, Times and Seasons,
3:19:875 [bold added]
-
"We are charged with advocating a
plurality of wives, and common property. Now this is as
false as the many other ridiculous charges which are brought
against us. No sect have a greater reverence for the
laws of matrimony, or the rights of private property, and we
do what others do not, practice what we preach..." (Times
and Seasons, 4:9:143, October 1, 1842, or pp. 939-940,
bold added)
-
"...[F]or the information of those who may
be assailed by those foolish tales about two wives, we would
say that no such principle ever existed among the Latter-day
Saints, and never will. This is well known to all who
are acquainted with our books and actions, the Book of
Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants; and also all our
periodicals are very strict on that subject, indeed far more
so than the Bible." (Millennial Star, vol. 111,
p. 74, bold added)
-
"What a thing it is for a man to be accused
of committing adultery, and having seven wives, when I can
only find one. I am the same man, and as innocent as I was
fourteen years ago; and I can prove them all perjurers." —
Joseph Smith, May 26, 1844, recorded in History of the
Church, vol. 6, p. 411
Questions:
Can it reasonably be argued that God is the author of such
contradictory messages? Does this not seem deceitful,
which appears to be condemned by the Old Testament?
"Cursed be he that doeth the work of the LORD
deceitfully..." (Jeremiah 48:10)
|
To add to these questions, when President
Gordon B. Hinckley was asked on Larry King Live about
polygamy, he responded:
-
"The figures I have are from between two
percent and five percent of our people were involved in it. It was a very limited practice; carefully safeguarded. In
1890, that practice was discontinued. The president of the
church, the man who occupied the position which I occupy
today, went before the people, said he had, oh, prayed about
it, worked on it, and had received from the Lord a
revelation that it was time to stop, to discontinue it then. That's 118 years ago. It's behind us... I condemn it, yes,
as a practice, because I think it is not doctrinal. It is
not legal. And this church takes the position that we will
abide by the law. We believe in being subject to kings,
presidents, rulers, magistrates in honoring, obeying and
sustaining the law." — President Gordon B. Hinckley, Larry
King Live radio program, September 8, 1998
Question:
Why would God's current prophet appear to philosophically and
universally denounce the practice? Couldn't he perhaps openly
declare that it was correctly introduced to raise up seed to
the Lord as per the Book of Mormon's apparent
directive, but was no longer required, and therefore the
practice was ended? Why would God's servants speak in such a
confusing fashion?
|
Back to Topics
Spiritual Gifts
According to the Book of Commandments,
Section 4:2, the following apparent revelation from God was
given in March 1829:
-
"And he (Joseph) has a gift to translate the
Book and I have commanded him that he shall pretend to no
other gift, for I will grant him no other gift."
[bold added]
One year later, on April 6, 1830, Joseph Smith
presented the following purported revelation:
-
"BEHOLD, there shall be a record kept among
you; and in it thou [Joseph Smith] shalt be called
a seer, a translator, a prophet, an apostle of Jesus Christ,
an elder of the church through the will of God the Father,
and the grace of your Lord Jesus Christ, Being inspired of
the Holy Ghost to lay the foundation thereof, and to
build it up unto the most holy faith. Which church was
organized and established in the year of your Lord eighteen
hundred and thirty, in the fourth month, and on the sixth
day of the month which is called April. Wherefore, meaning
the church, thou shalt give heed unto all his words and
commandments which he shall give unto you as he receiveth
them, walking in all holiness before me; For his word ye
shall receive, as if from mine own mouth, in all patience
and faith. For by doing these things the gates of hell shall
not prevail against you; yea, and the Lord God will disperse
the powers of darkness from before you, and cause the
heavens to shake for your good, and his name's glory. For
thus saith the Lord God: Him have I inspired to move the
cause of Zion in mighty power for good, and his diligence I
know, and his prayers I have heard. Yea, his weeping for
Zion I have seen, and I will cause that he shall mourn for
her no longer; for his days of rejoicing are come unto the
remission of his sins, and the manifestations of my
blessings upon his works. For, behold, I will bless all
those who labor in my vineyard with a mighty blessing, and
they shall believe on his words, which are given him through
me by the Comforter, which manifesteth that Jesus was
crucified by sinful men for the sins of the world, yea, for
the remission of sins unto the contrite heart." (Doctrine
and Covenants
21:1-9, bold added).
Questions:
Are the callings of a seer, a translator, a prophet, an
apostle of Jesus Christ, an elder of the church, and the
founder of God's church additional gifts? If so, is not
this inconsistent with the previous apparent revelation?
|
In the first edition of the Doctrine and
Covenants, Section 5:4 in 1835, the aforementioned passage
from the Book of Commandments was altered to read (the words
in red bold
underline were added and the words in
bold strikethrough were deleted):
-
"And he has
you have a gift to
translate the Book
plates; and this
is the first gift that I bestowed upon you;
and I have commanded him that
he you
shall
should pretend to no other gift,
until my purpose is fulfilled in
this; for I will grant unto him
you no other gift
until it is finished." (This wording is the
same in the current edition of the
Doctrine and Covenants 5:4)
Questions:
Is it consistent to believe that: 1) God would provide such
apparently contradictory revelations and allow them to be
publicly disseminated to the world, and, (2) that God's
authorized servant would only correct the first revelation
after he had assumed additional gifts? According the King
Benjamin of the Book of Mormon:
-
"...He never doth vary from that which he
hath said; therefore, if ye do keep his commandments he doth
bless and prosper you." (Mosiah
2:22)
Is it reasonable to assume that, with regard to
the question of legitimacy and who ultimately holds power over
God's church, God would allow his authorized servants to
portray him in such a fashion? It should be noted that
these alterations are attributed to the same God that refused
to allow Joseph Smith to re-translate the pages he lost
because, again according to the official LDS record, God's
enemies would attempt to change his word and discredit his
entire work in this age of mankind. |
Back to Topics
The Book of Mormon
A revelation purportedly given to Joseph Smith,
Oliver Cowdery, and David Whitmer in Fayette, New York, June
1829, in the Book of Commandments, Chapter 15, reads:
-
"Behold I give unto you a commandment,
that you rely upon the things which are written; for in them
are all things written, concerning my church, my
gospel, and my rock. Wherefore if you shall build up my
church, and my gospel, and my rock, the gates of hell shall
not prevail against you." [bold and underline added]
God appears to be stating that the things that
were written up to that time — June 1829 — contained all that
was necessary to build God's Church and proclaim his gospel to
mankind.
In the Doctrine and Covenants,
Section 16, however, this scripture has been altered to
read the following (the words in
red bold underline were added and the words in
bold strikethrough were deleted):
-
"Behold I give unto you a commandment, that
you rely upon the things which are written; for in them are
all things written, concerning
the foundation of my church, my gospel, and
my rock.
Wherefore ;
wherefore, if you shall build up my church,
and
upon the foundation of
my gospel, and my rock, the gates of
hell shall not prevail against you."
Question:
Is it reasonable to conclude that both of these revelations
are consistent and authored by the same God?
|
Let us look in the Book of Mormon again
to attempt to clarify this question. Jesus Christ [i.e. "the
Lamb"] purportedly tells the prophet Nephi:
-
"For, behold, saith the Lamb: I will manifest
myself unto thy seed, that they shall write many things
which I shall minister unto them, which shall be plain and
precious; and after thy seed shall be destroyed, and dwindle
in unbelief, and also the seed of thy brethren, behold,
these things shall be hid up, to come forth unto the
Gentiles, by the gift and power of the Lamb. And in them
shall be written my gospel, saith the Lamb, and my rock and
my salvation." (1
Nephi 13:35-36)
The Book of Mormon is apparently to come forth from the seed
of the Nephites, and it is supposed to contain God's gospel
and rock just as the aforementioned Book of Commandments
originally stated. Speaking again of the Book of Mormon,
God purportedly said:
-
"For thus it behooveth the Father that it
should come forth from the Gentiles, that he may show forth
his power unto the Gentiles, for this cause that the
Gentiles, if they will not harden their hearts, that they
may repent and come unto me and be baptized in my name
and know of the true points of my doctrine, that
they may be numbered among my people, O house of Israel." (3
Nephi 21:6, bold and underline added)
Questions:
The wording states "the true points of my doctrine,"
not "some" or "many" true points of God's doctrine. Why then
are the numerous books and other publications produced after
June 1829 considered scriptural or canonical by the LDS
Church, such as the Doctrine and Covenants, the Ensign,
the Pearl of Great Price, etc.? None of these are the
sealed records of Lehi's seed and none are alleged to be
written by Lehi's seed. These additional works contain
numerous references to doctrines that are apparently core to
the salvation of mankind and seem not to be discussed — even
remotely — in the Book of Mormon (examples: polygamy
and temple work for the living and deceased). Is it reasonable
to assume that God is the author of this apparent confusion or
lack of clarity?
|
Back to Topics
The Name of the Church
According to the Book of Mormon, Jesus
Christ revealed the name of his church to the Nephite people:
the "church of Christ".
-
"And they who were baptized in the name of
Jesus were called the church of Christ." (3
Nephi 26:21, bold added)
-
"And they said unto him: Lord, we will
that thou wouldst tell us the name whereby we shall call
this church; for there are disputations among the people
concerning this matter. And the Lord said unto them:
Verily, verily, I say unto you, why is it that the people
should murmur and dispute because of this thing? Have they
not read the scriptures, which say ye must take upon you the
name of Christ, which is my name? For by this name shall ye
be called at the last day; And whoso taketh upon him my
name, and endureth to the end, the same shall be saved at
the last day. Therefore, whatsoever ye shall do, ye shall do
it in my name; therefore ye shall call the church in my
name; and ye shall call upon the Father in my name that
he will bless the church for my sake. And how be it my
church save it be called in my name? For if a church be
called in Moses' name then it be Moses' church; or if it be
called in the name of a man then it be the church of a man;
but if it be called in my name then it is my church, if it
so be that they are built upon my gospel. Verily I say unto
you, that ye are built upon my gospel; therefore ye shall
call whatsoever things ye do call, in my name; therefore if
ye call upon the Father, for the church, if it be in my name
the Father will hear you; And if it so be that the church is
built upon my gospel then will the Father show forth his own
works in it. But if it be not built upon my gospel, and is
built upon the works of men, or upon the works of the devil,
verily I say unto you they have joy in their works for a
season, and by and by the end cometh, and they are hewn down
and cast into the fire, from whence there is no return." (3
Nephi 27:3-11, bold added)
On April 6, 1830, LDS church leaders met
together presumably to fulfill the requirements of the laws of
the land, and they named their church consistent with the
admonition of the Book of Mormon, "The Church of
Christ."
On May 3, 1834, Joseph Smith, as moderator,
made a motion to change the name of the church to, "The Church
of the Latter Day Saints," which was adopted by unanimous vote
(The Evening and Morning Star, vol. 2, no. 20, p. 160,
May 1834; History of the Church 2:62).
Four years later, on April 26, 1838, it was
again changed to "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints" and has remained thus since.
Questions:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would periodically change
the name of his church? If Jesus Christ is the central
character of God's religion on earth and all things are to be
done in his name, is it reasonable to assume that God would
instruct his church leaders to entirely leave out the name of
Christ from the period of May 3, 1834 to April 26, 1838?
|
Back to Topics
Objective LDS History
Apostle and
Elder Boyd K. Packer, at the Fifth Annual Church
Educational System Religious Educators' Symposium at Brigham
Young University in August 1981, stated:
-
"I have come to believe that it is the
tendency for many members of the Church who spend a great
deal of time in academic research to begin to judge the
Church, its doctrine, organization, and leadership, present
and past, by the principles of their own profession. Oft-times this is done unwittingly, and some of it, perhaps,
is not harmful...
-
"You seminary teachers and some of you
institute and BYU men will be teaching the history of the
Church this school year. This is an unparalleled opportunity
in the lives of your students to increase their faith and
testimony of the divinity of this work. Your objective
should be that they will see the hand of the Lord in every
hour and every moment of the Church from its beginning till
now...
-
"Church history can be so interesting and so
inspiring as to be a very powerful tool indeed for building
faith. If not properly written or properly taught, it may be
a faith destroyer...
-
"There is a temptation for the writer or the
teacher of Church history to want to tell everything,
whether it is worthy or faith promoting or not...
-
"Some things that are true are not very
useful...
-
"That historian or scholar who delights in
pointing out the weaknesses and frailties of present or past
leaders destroys faith. A destroyer of faith — particularly
one within the Church, and more particularly one who is
employed specifically to build faith — places himself in
great spiritual jeopardy. He is serving the wrong master,
and unless he repents, he will not be among the faithful in
the eternities...
-
"The final caution concerns the idea that so
long as something is already in print, so long as it is
available from another source, there is nothing out of order
in using it in writing or speaking, or teaching. Surely you
can see the fallacy in that. I have on occasion been
disappointed when I have read statements that tend to
belittle or degrade the Church or past leaders of the Church
in writings of those who are supposed to be worthy members
of the Church. When I have commented on my disappointment to
see that in print, the answer has been. 'It was printed
before, and it's available, and therefore I saw no reason
not to publish it again.'
-
"You do not do well to see that it is
disseminated. It may be read by those not mature enough for
'advanced history,' and a testimony in seedling stage may be
crushed... Do not spread disease germs." — Elder Boyd K.
Packer, "The Mantle is Far, Far Greater Than the Intellect,"
available through BYU Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 262
Questions:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would take such an
attitude with regard to the history of his single, true
organization on the earth? Would not God be prepared to
conduct all historical debates in the open and to
satisfactorily confront any apparent doctrinal or behavioral
inconsistencies perpetrated by imperfect mortals?
|
Many historical documents are available only
through those who openly profess to be antagonistic to the LDS
church. This website, for
example, contains the 1833 Book of Commandments.
This
website, as another
example, has a search engine for early publications such as
History of the Church, Journal of Discourses,
Times and Seasons, Evening and Morning Star, and
Elder's Journal.
This website
contains several documents, including interviews and letters
from David Whitmer, William McLellin, and William Law, the
actual text of the Nauvoo Expositor, speeches by Brigham
Young, and what remains of the end of the John Whitmer
journals. (see
http://www.2think.org/hundredsheep/boc/boc_main.shtml)
Question:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would leave it to
individuals and organizations antagonistic to his church to
discuss these types of issues and historical events?
|
Back to Topics
PART II: Questions of Loyalty & Trust
Loyalty to Mortals
According to the Book of Mormon, the
prophet Alma stated:
-
"Ye shall not esteem one flesh above another,
or one man shall not think himself above another... Even so
I desire that ye should stand fast in the liberty wherewith
ye have been made free, and that ye trust no man to be a
king over you. And also trust no one to be your
teacher nor your minister, except he be a man of God,
walking in his ways and keeping his commandments." (Mosiah
23:7,13-14, bold added)
The prophet Nephi from the Book of Mormon
stated the following:
-
"O Lord, I have trusted in thee and I will
trust in thee forever. I will not put my trust in the arm of
flesh; for I know that cursed is he that putteth his trust
in the arm of flesh. Yea, cursed is he that putteth his
trust in man or maketh flesh his arm." (2
Nephi 4:34)
-
"He commandeth that there shall be no
priestcrafts; for, behold, priestcrafts are that men preach
and set themselves up for a light unto the world, that they
may get gain and praise of the world; but they seek not the
welfare of Zion. Behold, the Lord hath forbidden this
thing..." (2
Nephi 26:29-30)
-
"They wear stiff necks and high heads; yea,
and because of pride and wickedness, and abominations, and
whoredoms, they have all gone astray save it be a few, who
are the humble followers of Christ; nevertheless, they
are led that in many instances they do err because they
are taught by the precepts of men." (2
Nephi 28:14)
-
"Cursed is he that putteth his trust in
man, or maketh flesh his arm, or shall hearken unto the
precepts of men, save their precepts shall be given by the
power of the Holy Ghost. Wo unto the Gentiles, saith the
Lord of Hosts! For notwithstanding I shall lengthen mine arm
unto them from day to day, they will deny me..." (2
Nephi 28:31-32, bold added)
The Biblical prophet Isaiah is quoted in
2 Nephi 13:12:
-
"And my people, children are their
oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they who
lead thee cause thee to err and destroy the ways of thy
paths."
-
"For the leaders of this people cause them to
err; and they that are led of them are destroyed." (2
Nephi 19:16)
From the New Testament scripture that
purportedly had great influence on Joseph Smith to scrutinize
the religions of his day:
-
"If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of
God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not;
and it shall be given him." (James
1:5, bold added)
-
And from Corinthians in the New Testament:
-
"Ye are bought with a price; be ye not
therefore the servants of men." (1
Corinthians 7:23, bold added)
Compare these passages with statements by
modern LDS prophets. For instance, the LDS
12th Article of Faith, purportedly written by Joseph Smith
(and contained alongside the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and
Coventants, Pearl of Great Price, and Bible in their canonized
scriptures) states:
"We believe in being subject to kings,
presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring,
and sustaining the law."
Question:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would instruct his people,
the Nephites, to "trust no man to be a king over you,"
instruct modern men and women to follow the Nephite teachings,
and simultaneously expect us all to "be subject to kings"?
Note: To examine how Mormon leaders apply this
doctrine of subjection in the past and present, see a related
article, under Topic 4, "Mormon
Leaders Schmooze East German Dictator," as well as the
article's "Appendix
2: Mormon Territorial Legislature Enacts Slavery".
|
Wilford Woodruff, the third President of the
LDS Church, also stated:
-
"The Lord will never permit me or any other
man who stands as President of this Church to lead you
astray. It is not in the programme. It is not in the mind of
God. If I were to attempt that, the Lord would remove me out
of my place, and so He will any other man who attempts to
lead the children of men astray from the oracles of God and
from their duty." (Excerpts from Three Addresses by
President Wilford Woodruff Regarding the Manifesto,
Doctrine and Covenants, under
Declaration 1)
The April 2002 LDS General Conference provides
another example:
-
"One of the sneaky ploys of the adversary is
to have us believe that unquestioning obedience to the
principles and commandments of God is blind obedience. His
goal is to have us believe that we should be following our
own worldly ways and selfish ambitions. This he does by
persuading us that 'blindly' following the prophets and
obeying the commandments is not thinking for ourselves. He
teaches that it is not intelligent to do something just
because we are told to do so by a living prophet or by
prophets who speak to us from the scriptures.
-
"Our unquestioning obedience to the Lord's
commandments is not blind obedience. President Boyd K.
Packer in the April conference of 1983 taught us about this:
'Latter-day Saints are not obedient because they are
compelled to be obedient. They are obedient because they
know certain spiritual truths and have decided, as an
expression of their own individual agency, to obey the
commandments of God. . . . We are not obedient because we
are blind, we are obedient because we can see' — Elder Boyd
K. Packer, "Agency
and Control," Ensign, May 1983, 66).
-
"We might call this 'faith obedience.' With
faith, Abraham was obedient in preparing Isaac for
sacrifice; with faith, Nephi was obedient in obtaining the
brass plates; with faith, a little child obediently jumps
from a height into the strong arms of his father. "Faith
obedience" is a matter of trust. The question is simple: Do
we trust our Heavenly Father? Do we trust our prophets?" —
Elder R. Conrad Schultz, "Faith
Obedience," April 2002 General Conference Report,
Ensign)
From President Ezra Taft Benson:
-
"President Marion G. Romney tells of this
incident, which happened to him: I remember years ago when I
was a Bishop I had President [Heber J.] Grant talk to our
ward. After the meeting I drove him home.... Standing by me,
he put his arm over my shoulder and said: 'My boy, you
always keep your eye on the President of the Church, and if
he ever tells you to do anything, and it is wrong, and you
do it, the Lord will bless you for it.' Then with a
twinkle in his eye, he said, 'But you don't need to worry. The Lord will never let his mouthpiece lead the people
astray.'" — Elder Ezra Taft Benson Fourteen, "Fundamentals
in Following a Prophet," given at the Marrriott Center at
Brigham Young University, February 6, 1980; see also Ensign
Conference Report, October 1960, p. 78 [bold added]
From the LDS-owned and -operated Deseret
News newspaper and Improvement Era magazine:
-
"Any Latter-day Saint who denounces or
opposes whether actively or otherwise, any plan or doctrine
advocated by the prophets, seers, revelators' of the church,
is cultivating the spirit of apostasy. One cannot speak evil
of the lord's anointed... and retain the holy spirit in his
heart. This sort of game is Satan's favorite pastime, and he
has practiced it to believing souls since Adam. He [Satan]
wins a great victory when he can get members of the church
to speak against their leaders and to do their own thinking.
-
"When our leaders speak, the thinking has
been done. When they propose a plan — it is God's Plan. When
they point the way, there is no other which is safe. When
they give directions, it should mark the end of controversy,
God works in no other way. To think otherwise, without
immediate repentance, may cost one his faith, may destroy
his testimony, and leave him a stranger to the kingdom of
God." (Ward Teachers Message, Deseret News, Church
Section p. 5, May 26, 1945; also included in the
Improvement Era, June 1945)
From Heber C. Kimball:
-
"In regard to our situation and circumstances
in these valleys, brethren WAKE UP! WAKE UP, YE ELDERS OF
ISRAEL, AND LIVE TO GOD and none else; and learn to do as
you are told, both old and young: learn to do as you are
told for the future, And when you are taking a position, if
you do not know that you are right, do not take it [—] I mean
independently. But if you are told by your leader to do a
thing, do it. None of your business whether it is right or
wrong... you and I want to live our religion and do as we
are told, not questioning a word for a moment. You have got
to stop that. It is enough for others to do that, without
our meddling with those things. I am speaking to the Elders
of Israel." — Heber C. Kimball, Journal of Discourses,
vol. 3, pp. 32-33
Finally, LDS members who receive their temple
endowment ceremony make a solemn covenant to avoid "evil
speaking of the Lord's anointed," i.e. the LDS leaders.
Questions:
How can the LDS-endorsed scriptures previously cited be
consistent with any of these statements by LDS leaders? Is not
the implied and reinforced message that a member who speaks
negatively about modern LDS leaders has engaged in "evil
speaking" — regardless of whether the statements are true?
Is it reasonable to assume that God would supply and endorse
such seemingly contradictory messages?
I must add my subjective experience as a
freedom advocate in Utah to illustrate additional questions I
was forced to consider. I have publicly taken the LDS church
to task for some of the political activities of its direct
corporate subsidiaries (such as the Deseret News and
various Utah radio stations). Regardless of whether my
scrutiny is accurate, I have been considered heretical and
evil for merely stating what I perceive and have personally
witnessed.
If one risks eternal damnation by merely
questioning or scrutinizing the words or actions of other
mortals, how can one determine whether the course one is
following is the correct course? Is it reasonable to conclude
that God would command us to question the actions of some
organizations, but not the very organization and servants he
holds up as "the light of the world" (Matthew
5:14, New Testament)? Does it seem consistent and just to
believe that some mortals are more equal than other mortals —
in that they are inherently less subject to public (and
private) scrutiny?
For more discussion on the Judeo-Christian
origins of the doctrine of loyalty to men in certain positions
of power, see "The
'Refined Racism' of a 'Chosen People'".
|
Back to Topics
Loyalty to an Organization
Current LDS President Gordon B. Hinckley
stated:
-
"The strength of this cause and kingdom is
not found in its temporal assets, impressive as they may be.
Faith underlies loyalty to the Church." ("The
Miracle of Faith," Ensign, May 2001, bold added)
-
"Now, brothers and sisters, let us go forth
from this conference with a stronger resolve to live the
gospel, to be more faithful, to be better fathers and
mothers and sons and daughters, to be absolutely loyal to
one another as families, and absolutely loyal to the Church
as members." ("Good-bye
for Another Season," Ensign, May 2001, bold
added)
Questions:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would require mortals to
exercise faith and loyalty in an inanimate object: an
organization? Are not organizations mere groupings of
individuals that comprise them? This personification is
confusing. Does this mean that individuals are to have
faith and loyalty in the leaders of organization? If so,
then the previous questions regarding loyalty to mortals may
also be asked here.
|
Back to Topics
PART III: Questions of Authority
Melchizedek/Aaronic Priesthoods
Several details surrounding Joseph Smith's
purported reception of authority — be it Melchizedek, Aaronic,
or otherwise — are unclear based upon historical LDS records.
First, the exact date of the reception of the supposed
Melchizedek Priesthood is not known. Second, accounts of
the reception and bestowal of this higher priesthood are
confusing. According to the Doctrine and Covenants:
-
"And also with Peter, and James, and John,
whom I have sent unto you [note: this apparently refers
to the Melchizedek Priesthood, as John the Baptist
purportedly came alone to confer the Aaronic Priesthood on
Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery], by whom I have ordained
you and confirmed you [i.e. Joseph Smith and Oliver
Cowdery] to be apostles, and especial witnesses of my name,
and bear the keys of your ministry and of the same things
which I revealed unto them; Unto whom I have
committed the keys of my kingdom, and a dispensation of the
gospel for the last times; and for the fulness of times, in
the which I will gather together in one all things, both
which are in heaven, and which are on earth; And also with
all those whom my Father hath given me out of the world. Wherefore, lift up your hearts and rejoice, and gird up your
loins, and take upon you my whole armor, that ye may be able
to withstand the evil day, having done all, that ye may be
able to stand. Stand, therefore, having your loins girt
about with truth, having on the breastplate of
righteousness, and your feet shod with the preparation of
the gospel of peace, which I have sent mine angels to commit
unto you..." (Doctrine and Covenants
27:12-16, bold added and notes added in brackets)
Oliver Cowdery, who claimed to be present when
Joseph Smith received the Melchizedek Priesthood, wrote of one
angel rather than three angels:
-
"I was present with Joseph when an holy angel
[note: purportedly John the Baptist] from God came down from
heaven and conferred on us, or restored, the lesser or
Aaronic Priesthood, and said to us, at the same time, that
it should remain upon the earth while the earth stands. I
was also present with Joseph when the higher or Melchizedek
Priesthood was conferred by the holy angel from on
high. This Priesthood, we then conferred on each other by
the will and commandment of God." (History of the Church,
vol. 1, p. 40 footnote, bold added and note added in
brackets)
Questions:
Is it reasonable to conclude that God would allow the exact
date of the restoration of the most important power on earth
to be forgotten and not recorded? Is it reasonable to
accept that God would permit the only two witnesses of such an
historic event to appear to contradict one another on the
matter of the number of angels present at that crucial
occasion?
|
Back to Topics
Offices
The LDS church teaches that the great order of
Melchizedeck is unending; therefore this priesthood order,
along with offices such as high priest, must exist in Jesus
Christ's Church today. The heading over the original Book of
Commandments is as follows:
-
"The Articles and Covenants of the Church of
Christ, given in Fayette, New York, June, 1830."
The revelation then goes on to describe the
duties and offices of an "elder," "priest," and "teacher" —
the three offices mentioned in Moroni 3 of the Book of
Mormon. Two paragraphs were later added to the middle of
this revelation in the Doctrine and Covenants in 1832
in Kirtland Ohio, which introduced — for the first time —
other "higher" offices: "high priests," "president of the high
priesthood," "high counselors," etc.
The titles of offices such as "elder" appear to
have been interchangeably used in both the lower and higher
priesthoods. Doctrine and Covenants, Section
107:7 states that:
-
"The office of an elder comes under the
priesthood of Melchizedek."
According to various LDS historical sources,
however, it appears that the office of an elder was not
originally part of this Melchizedeck Priesthood. Apparently,
men who had already been ordained to the office of an elder
were later given the Melchizedek Priesthood:
-
"...The authority of the Melchizedek
Priesthood was manifested and conferred for the first time
upon several of the Elders." (History of the
Church, vol. 1, pp. 175-176, bold added)
-
"It was the privilege of every Elder
present to be ordained to the High Priesthood." (Joseph
Smith, Far West Record, October 25, 1831, over two
years after the "High Priesthood" was supposedly restored,
bold added.)
-
"A general conference was called and... the
Lord made manifest to Joseph that it was necessary that
such of the elders as were considered worthy, should be
ordained to the high priesthood." (John Whitmer's
History, Chapter VII, June 3, 1831, bold added)
-
"The Melchizedek priesthood was then (June
4, 1831) for the first time introduced, and conferred on
several of the elders." (John Corrill, Brief History
of the Church of Christ of Latter Day Saints, 1839,
Chapter 10, bold added)
-
"On the sixth of June, 1831, a general
conference was convened at Kirtland, consisting of all the
Elders, far and near, who could be got together. In this
conference much instruction was given by President Smith,
who spake in great power, as he was moved by the Holy Ghost;
and the spirit of power and of testimony rested down upon
the Elders in a marvelous manner. Here also were some
strange manifestations of false spirits, which were
immediately rebuked. Several were then selected by
revelation, through President Smith, and ordained to the
High Priesthood after the order of the Son of God, which is
after the order of Melchizedek. This was the first occasion
in which this priesthood had been revealed and conferred
upon the Elders in this dispensation, although the office of
an Elder is the same in a certain degree, but not in the
fullness. On this occasion I was ordained to this holy
ordinance and calling by President Smith." — Apostle Parley
P. Pratt in Chapter 10 of his autobiography [bold added]
-
"...Neither did I ever hear of such a thing
as an angel ordaining them until I got into Ohio about the
year 1834 or later. Oliver stated to me in Joseph's
presence that they had baptized each other seeking by
that to fulfill the command. And after our arrival at
fathers sometime in June 1829, Joseph ordained Oliver to be
an Elder, and Oliver ordained Joseph to be an Elder in the
Church of Christ." — David Whitmer, David Whitmer
Interviews, p. 154 [bold added]
Note & Disclaimer:
David Whitmer wrote this account after he had left the LDS
church. Therefore, some might take issue with the
objectivity or accuracy of this statement.
Question:
Is it reasonable to conclude that God would, without
explanation, empower members of his church to hold an office
in a priesthood that had not yet been bestowed upon them?
|
Back to Topics
Baptism
According to the Book of Mormon, Jesus
Christ instructed the Nephites to use specific language when
performing baptisms:
-
"On this wise shall ye baptize; and there
shall be no disputations among you. Verily I say unto you,
that whoso repenteth of his sins through your words, and
desireth to be baptized in my name, on this wise shall ye
baptize them—Behold, ye shall go down and stand in the
water, and in my name shall ye baptize them. And now behold,
these are the words which ye shall say, calling them by
name, saying: Having authority given me of Jesus
Christ, I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the
Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen. And then shall ye immerse
them in the water, and come forth again out of the water...
And according as I have commanded you thus shall ye baptize. And there shall be no disputations among you, as there have
hitherto been; neither shall there be disputations among you
concerning the points of my doctrine, as there have hitherto
been." (3
Nephi 11:22-26, 28)
LDS leaders now utilize different baptismal
language. They state the following:
-
"[Stating the person's name], having been commissioned of Jesus Christ, I
baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and
of the Holy Ghost. Amen."
Question: Baptism is, according to Christian and LDS philosophy,
a prerequisite to entering heaven in the hereafter. Is
it reasonable to conclude that God would command one group of
his followers to state the baptismal utterance one way without
any deviance there from, and then change that verbiage for
another group without any explanation? |
Back to Topics
PART IV: Questions of Occult
Relationships
Masonic & LDS Temple Origins
In March 1842 in Nauvoo, Illinois, Joseph was
purportedly initiated into the Freemasonry, part of the
worldwide Masonic Order:
-
"In the evening I received the first degree
in free masonry in the Nauvoo Lodge, assembled in my
general business office." (Joseph Smith's History
under the date of March 15, 1842, History of the Church,
vol. 4, p. 551)
-
"I was with the Masonic Lodge and rose to the
Sublime Degree." (Joseph Smith's History under the
date of March 15, 1842, History of the Church, vol.
4, p. 552)
Two days later,
Joseph Smith commenced the Relief Society in the Masonic
Lodge:
-
"[17 March 1842] [I assisted in commencing
the organization of "The Female] Relief Society of Nauvoo"
in the "Lodge Room." (An American Prophet's Record: The
Diaries and Journals of Joseph Smith, Edited by Scott H.
Faulring, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1989, p. 244)
On May 4, 1842, less than two months after
becoming a Mason, Joseph Smith introduced the LDS temple
endowment ceremony:
-
"Wednesday, 4. I spent the day in the upper
part of the store, that is in my private office (so called
because in that room I keep my sacred writings, translate
ancient records, and receive revelations) and in my general
business office, or lodge room (that is where the Masonic
fraternity meet occasionally for want of a better place) in
council with General James Adams, of Springfield, Patriarch
Hyrum Smith, Bishops Newel K. Whitney and George Miller, and
President Brigham Young and Elders Heber C. Kimball and
Willard Richards, instructing them in the principles and
order of the Priesthood, attending to washings, anointings,
endowments and the communication of keys, pertaining to the
Aaronic Priesthood, and so on to the highest order of the
Melchisedek Priesthood..." (History of the Church,
vol. 5, pp. 1-2)
Joseph Smith's journals contain many references
to performing LDS temple ceremonies and other matters in the
Masonic lodge in Nauvoo:
-
"Saturday, June 24[th] Celebration of St.
Johns [Day] in Nauvoo Laying the corner stone of the Masonic
Temple on Main St[reet]. [rest of page blank]" (An
American Prophet's Record: The Diaries and Journals of
Joseph Smith, Edited by Scott H. Faulring, Salt Lake
City, Utah, 1989, p. 388)
-
"Thursday, 11 April 1844 In council [with
Council of Fifty] in the Masonic Hall A.M. and P.M. [rest of
page left blank.]" (An American Prophet's Record: The
Diaries and Journals of Joseph Smith, Edited by Scott H.
Faulring, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1989, p. 470)
-
"Thursday, Feb[ruary] 9[th] 1843 Was at the
Masonic Hall some time in the forenoon...." (An American
Prophet's Record: The Diaries and Journals of Joseph Smith,
Edited by Scott H. Faulring, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1989, p.
300)
-
"Monday, 11 March 1844 At home. 9 A.M. in
council [with Council of Fifty] in Lodge room. Henry
Miller's. P.M. in council same place. [rest of page blank]"
(An American Prophet's Record: The Diaries and Journals
of Joseph Smith, Edited by Scott H. Faulring, Salt Lake
City, Utah, 1989, p. 459)
Mormon historian B.H. Roberts wrote:
-
"A photogravure of the 'brick store' in the
upper story of which were instituted these sacred ceremonies
accompanies this chapter. In addition to its use as a
'temple' it was also the place of meeting for the Nauvoo
Lodge of Free Masons." (Comprehensive History of the
Church, vol. 2, pp. 135-136)
Wilford Woodruff, the fourth President of the
LDS church, testified in court:
-
"I do not say there were any washings in the
Masonic Temple, but there were meetings held in the Masonic
temple. There were certain ordinances performed there at the
start, because there was no temple built at that time." (Temple
Lot Case, which regarded a dispute over property on
which a LDS temple was to be built, p. 299)
Some legends claim that modern Freemasonry was
handed down from the time of King Solomon. Solomon,
along with Hiram Abiff, the head mason for the temple of
Solomon, purportedly passed on many mysteries and secrets of
the workings of God. Masons claim to have maintained
that information through the ages in the form of secret rites
and rituals. These activities are, therefore, clearly based
upon religious philosophy (though Masons sometimes downplay
the religious foundation/underpinnings of their origins).
The Book of Mormon appears to speak
against secret societies that are very reminiscent of the
worldwide Masonic Order:
-
"He commandeth that there shall be no
priestcrafts; for, behold, priestcrafts are that men
preach and set themselves up for a light unto the world,
that they may get gain and praise of the world; but they
seek not the welfare of Zion. Behold, the Lord hath
forbidden this thing..." (2
Nephi 26:29-30, bold added)
-
"For the Lord worketh not in secret
combinations, neither doth he will that man should shed
blood, but in all things hath forbidden it, from the
beginning of man... Wherefore, O ye Gentiles, it is wisdom
in God that these things should be shown unto you, that
thereby ye may repent of your sins, and suffer not that
these murderous combinations shall get above you, which are
built up to get power and gain—and the work, yea, even the
work of destruction come upon you, yea, even the sword of
the justice of the Eternal God shall fall upon you, to your
overthrow and destruction if ye shall suffer these things to
be. Wherefore, the Lord commandeth you, when ye shall see
these things come among you that ye shall awake to a sense
of your awful situation, because of this secret combination
which shall be among you; or wo be unto it, because of the
blood of them who have been slain; for they cry from the
dust for vengeance upon it, and also upon those who built it
up. For it cometh to pass that whoso buildeth it up seeketh
to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and
countries; and it bringeth to pass the destruction of all
people...." (Ether
8:19, 23-25, bold added)
-
"And it shall come in a day when the blood of
saints shall cry unto the Lord, because of secret
combinations and the works of darkness... Yea, why do ye
build up your secret abominations to get gain, and cause
that widows should mourn before the Lord, and also orphans
to mourn before the Lord, and also the blood of their
fathers and their husbands to cry unto the Lord from the
ground, for vengeance upon your heads?" (Mormon
8:27, 40)
The Book of Mormon also describes a
character named Gadianton, the first significant leader of a
Nephite secret society, as one who was,
-
"...Expert in many words, and also in his
craft." (Helaman
2:4)
Joseph Smith also made statements like the
following:
-
"We further, caution our brethren, against
the impropriety of the organization of bands of companies,
by covenant, oaths, penalties, or secresies, but let the
time past of our experience and sufferings by the wickedness
of Docter Avard suffice, and let our covenants, be that of
the everlasting covenant, as it is contained in the holy
writ, and the things which God has revealed unto us; pure
friendship, always becomes weakened, the very moment you
undertake to make it stronger by penal oaths and secrecy." (Times
and Seasons, 1:9:133)
Joseph Smith shared the following opinion of
Freemasonry in particular:
-
"In the diary of Benjamin F. Johnson, an
intimate friend and associate of Joseph Smith, it is
recorded that 'Joseph told me that Freemasonry was the
apostate endowment, as sectarian religion was the
apostate religion.' Elder Heber C. Kimball, who had been a
Mason for many years, related that after Joseph Smith became
a Mason, he explained to his brethren that Masonry had been
taken from the priesthood." (Mormonism and Masonry,
by E. Cecil McGavin, Salt Lake City, 1956, p. 199, bold
added)
Note: E. Cecil McGavin
appears to have remained an LDS member in good standing and
been very supportive of official LDS doctrine and positions.
Yet, despite these statements, the number of
Masonic initiates continued to explode in Nauvoo:
-
"Meanwhile, large numbers of Nauvoo citizens
were inducted into the fraternity. Soon the Nauvoo Lodge had
more members than all the other Illinois lodges together. It
became the largest in the state. In this rapid growth, some
lodge errors appear to have been made." (Evidences and
Reconciliations, John A. Widtsoe, 3 Volumes in 1, p.
358)
And, again from the popular book, Mormonism
and Masonry:
-
"At this time there were only two hundred
twenty-seven Masons in Illinois outside of Nauvoo. These
were distributed among eleven lodges, making an average of
twenty-one members in each loge. The largest lodge was in
Springfield, with a membership of forty-three.
-
"Within five months, the Mormons initiated
two hundred eighty-six members in Nauvoo, and forty-five in
the Rising Sun Lodge at Montrose, Iowa.
-
"Thus there were more Masons in Nauvoo in a
few weeks than there were in all other lodges in Illinois
combined." (Mormonism and Masonry, E. Cecil McGavin,
Salt Lake City, 1956, pp. 89-92)
Pro-LDS sources report that, in a letter to
Parley P. Pratt on June 17, 1842, apostle Heber C. Kimball
wrote the following:
"We have received some precious things
through the Prophet on the priesthood that would cause your
soul to rejoice. I can not give them to you on paper for
they are not to be written. So you must come and get them
for your self. We have organized a lodge here of Masons
since we obtained a charter. That was in March. Since that
there was near two hundred been made masons. Br. Joseph and
Sidney [Rigdon] was the first that was received into the
lodge. All of the twelve apostles have become members except
Orson Pratt. He hangs back. He will wake up soon, there is a
similarity of priesthood in Masonry. Bro. Joseph says
Masonry was taken from priesthood but has become
degenerated. But many things are perfect." — Heber
C. Kimball, included in Heber C. Kimball: Mormon Patriarch
and Pioneer, by Stanley B. Kimball, Univ. of Illinois
Press, Urbana, Illinois, 1986, p. 85 [bold added]
Heber C. Kimball reportedly stated later in
1858, that:
"We have the true Masonry. The Masonry of
today is received from the apostasy which took place in the
days of Solomon and David. They have now and then a
thing that is correct, but we have the real thing" — Heber
C. Kimball, included in “Heber C. Kimball: Mormon Patriarch
and Pioneer,” by Stanley B. Kimball, Univ. of Illinois
Press, Urbana, Illinois, 1986, p. 85 [bold added]
Questions:
If Joseph Smith believed that Freemasonry was the "apostate
endowment," why did he and his followers continue to
participate in Freemasonry? Why did they build the
Masonic Lodge of "an apostate religion" in Nauvoo? Why
did they continue to recruit and hold Masonic meetings in that
Lodge, and restore — and continue to perform — the sacred new
LDS temple endowment in that Lodge?
Is it reasonable to assume that God would allow
his credibility to be questioned by authorizing Joseph Smith
to set up his women's society two days after he had
been initiated into the "apostate endowment" (and had likely
been introduced to the concept of various Masonic orders
specifically for women)? Is it likewise reasonable to
assume that God would authorize the true endowment to be
restored less than two months after his servant had
been initiated into the "apostate endowment"? Is it
reasonable to conclude that God would not have warned Joseph
Smith away from all such secret societies?
|
Back to Topics
Blood/Penal Oaths
Masonic oaths involved blood penalties, such as
slitting your throat, chest, and abdominal region (though
Masons claim that these penalties are merely symbolic). Without going into additional detail or reference material
that might offend LDS members, Joseph Smith incorporated these
three penalties into the LDS temple endowment ceremony. These
penalties were removed in approximately 1990. Compare
this with the purported words of Jesus Christ in the Book
of Mormon and New Testament:
-
"And again it is written, thou shalt not
forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine
oaths; But verily, verily, I say unto you, swear not at
all; neither by heaven, for it is God's throne; Nor by
the earth, for it is his footstool; Neither shalt thou
swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair
black or white; But let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay,
nay; for whatsoever cometh of more than these is evil." (3
Nephi 12:33-37; see also
Matthew 5:24, bold added)
And consider the words and actions of two evil
secret society founders in the Book of Mormon, Giddianhi and
Akish:
-
"And behold, I am Giddianhi; and I am the
governor of this the secret society of Gadianton
[referenced above]; which society and the works
thereof I know to be good; and they are of ancient date
and they have been handed down unto us." (3
Nephi 3:9, bold added and note added in brackets)
-
"And it came to pass that they all sware
unto him, by the God of heaven, and also by the heavens,
and also by the earth, and by their head, that whoso
should vary from the assistance which Akish desired
should lose his head; and whoso should divulge
whatsoever thing Akish made known unto them, the same
should lose his life." (Ether
8:14, bold added)
The Pearl of Great Price, which Joseph
Smith purportedly translated, also postulates that such blood
penalties are of ancient date and of Satanic origin:
-
"And Satan said unto Cain: Swear unto me
by thy throat, and if thou tell it thou shalt die; and
swear thy brethren by their heads, and by the living God,
that they tell it not; for if they tell it, they shall
surely die; and this that thy father may not know it; and
this day I will deliver thy brother Abel into thine hands. And Satan sware unto Cain that he would do according to his
commands. And all these things were done in secret. And Cain
said: Truly I am Mahan, the master of this great secret,
that I may murder and get gain. Wherefore Cain was called
Master Mahan, and he gloried in his wickedness... For,
from the days of Cain, there was a secret combination,
and their works were in the dark, and they knew every man
his brother." (Book of Moses
5:29-31,51, Pearl of Great Price, bold added)
Again, as cited in the previous section, Joseph Smith
spoke against penal oaths:
"We further, caution our brethren, against
the impropriety of the organization of bands of companies,
by covenant, oaths, penalties, or secresies, but let the
time past of our experience and sufferings by the wickedness
of Docter Avard suffice, and let our covenants, be that of
the everlasting covenant, as it is contained in the holy
writ, and the things which God has revealed unto us; pure
friendship, always becomes weakened, the very moment you
undertake to make it stronger by penal oaths and secrecy." (Times
and Seasons, 1:9:133)
Question:
Is it reasonable to conclude that God would be pleased with
leaders who affiliated with a secret society that taught blood
and penal oaths? Is it reasonable to conclude that God would
command men at one time to refuse to participate in blood
oaths or swearing that involved body parts, and then
completely reverse that command without any satisfactory
explanation?
|
Back to Topics
Masters & Titles
Upon achieving the "Sublime Degree," or third
degree, of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Joseph Smith also
took upon himself the title of "Master Mason." Compare this
with the words of Jesus Christ in the New Testament:
-
"But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your
Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. And call no
man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father,
which is in heaven. Neither be ye called masters: for one
is your Master, even Christ. But he that is greatest
among you shall be your servant. And whosoever shall exalt
himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself
shall be exalted." (Matthew
23:8-12, bold added)
In the Pearl of Great Price, Cain also
takes upon himself the title of "Master":
-
"And Cain said: Truly I am Mahan, the
master of this great secret, that I may murder and get
gain. Wherefore Cain was called Master Mahan, and he
gloried in his wickedness." (Book
of Moses 5:31, bold added)
Questions:
Is it reasonable to conclude that God's servant would freely
take upon himself the title of "master" when the presumed
author of his faith, Jesus Christ, appears to have
specifically commanded mankind not to do so? Is it
reasonable and healthy for a mortal to view himself, and be
viewed by others, as a "master" who is somehow above the
standing of other mortals?
|
Back to Topics
Clothing
The following Book of Mormon passage is
used to support the concept of a man-made temple garment:
-
"Awake, awake, put on thy strength, O Zion;
put on thy beautiful garments, O Jerusalem, the holy city;
for henceforth there shall no more come into thee the
uncircumcised and the unclean." (2
Nephi 2:8; see also
3 Nephi 20:36;
Moroni 10:31) -
Tangential Questions:
Does this scripture refer to an actual garment, or a more
traditional Christian reference to Jerusalem's symbolic
marriage garments to Jesus Christ? When the prophets
of the
Book of Mormon referred to their garments, why does
it always appear that they do so in the spiritual sense of a
possession they did not yet have — as though a garment
awaited them in heaven? See the following Book of Mormon
passages: 2 Nephi 9:44; Jacob 1:19; 2:2; Mosiah 2:28; Alma
7:25; 13:11-12; 34:36; 46:21-27; 3 Nephi 27:19; Mormon 9:35.
LDS clothing has much in common with the
Masonic Order. Masons traditionally don a lambskin or white
apron and, again without going into additional detail that
might offend LDS members, an apron is involved in LDS temple
endowment ceremonies. The Book of Mormon informs
us that the aforementioned Gadianton robbers wore "a lambskin
about their loins." (3
Nephi 4:7)
The LDS ceremony includes a cotton strand
attached to the hat, or cap, and secured to a robe. The
Masonic candidate has a rope called a Cable-tow around his
neck. Again, according to the Book of Mormon:
-
"And there are also secret combinations...
according to the combinations of the devil... and he leadeth
them by the neck with a flaxen cord...." (3
Nephi 26:22)
In the LDS temple endowment ceremony (this
portion of the ceremony has been publicly discussed by pro-LDS
sources outside the temple), the character Adam asks the
character Satan, "What is that apron you have on?" Satan
replies, "It is an emblem of my power and priesthoods."
Up until recent years, this same Satan
character wore a black apron containing the symbols of a
square, compass, and line on it. These symbols were removed in
recent years, but remain important elements of LDS articles of
clothing (which I will also decline to discuss further out of
sensitivity). These symbols are identical to those used by
Masons.
Questions:
Is it reasonable to conclude that symbols of the Satan
character, as well as those of secret societies apparently
condemned by the Book of Mormon, would be used in a
similar fashion on clothing God instructed mankind to wear?
|
Back to Topics
Work for the Dead
Joseph Smith stated:
-
"The greatest responsibility in this world
that God has laid upon us is to seek after our dead. The
apostle says, 'They without us cannot be made perfect'; for
it is necessary that the sealing power should be in our
hands to seal our children and our dead for the fulness of
the dispensation of times—a dispensation to meet the
promises made by Jesus Christ before the foundation of the
world for the salvation of man." (History of the Church,
vol. 6, p. 313)
Back to Topics
PART V: Questions of Moral Character
Boasting
The LDS History of the Church records
the following quotes by Joseph Smith:
-
"Come on! ye prosecutors! ye false swearers! All hell, boil over! Ye burning mountains, roll down your
lava! for I will come out on top at last. I have more to
boast of than ever any man had. I am the only man that has
ever been able to keep a whole church together since the
days of Adam. A large majority of the whole have stood by
me. Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I
boast that no man ever did such a work as I. The followers
of Jesus ran away from Him; but the Latter-day Saints never
ran away from me yet... When they can get rid of me, the
devil will also go." — Joseph Smith, History of the
Church, vol. 6, pp. 408, 409
Question:
Does any individual have sufficient reason and justification
to boast of his/her spiritual accomplishments, and to compare
one's self to others in this fashion? And is it
reasonable to believe that God would approve of such
comparisons?
|
And consider this quote by Joseph Smith:
-
"...The whole earth shall bear me witness
that I, like the towering rock in the midst of the ocean,
which has withstood the mighty surges of the warring waves
for centuries, am impregnable, and am a faithful friend to
virtue, and a fearless foe to vice,no odds whether the
former was sold as a pearl in Asia or hid as a gem in
America, and the latter dazzles in palaces or glimmers among
the tombs. I combat the errors of ages; I meet the violence
of mobs; I cope with illegal proceedings from executive
authority; I cut the gordian knot of powers. and I solve
mathematical problems of universities, with truth-diamond
truth; and God is my 'right hand man.'" — Joseph Smith,
History of the Church, vol. 6, p. 78
Question:
Is this attitude reasonable?
|
Consider this quote as well:
-
"God made Aaron to be the mouth piece for the
children of Israel, and He will make me be god to you in His
stead, and the Elders to be mouth for me; and if you don't
like it, you must lump it." — Joseph Smith, History of
the Church, vol. 6, pp. 319-320
Question:
Is it reasonable and healthy for a mortal to view himself, and
be viewed by others, as a god to other mortals?
|
Prior to these quotes, in the 1833 Book of
Commandments (again, this was the LDS predecessor to the
Doctrine and Covenants), God purportedly warns Joseph
Smith in July of 1828:
-
"Remember, remember, that it is not the work
of God that is frustrated, but the work of men: for although
a man may have many revelations, and have power to do many
mighty works, yet if he boasts in his own strength,
and sets at nought the counsels of God, and follows after
the dictates of his own will, and carnal desires, he must
fall and incur the vengence of a just God upon him. Behold,
you have been intrusted with these things, but how strict
were your commandments; and remember, also, the promises
which were made to you, if you did not transgress them; and
behold, how oft you have transgressed the commandments and
the laws of God, and have gone on in the persuasions of men:
for behold, you should not have feared man more than God,
although men set at nought the counsels of God, and despise
his words, yet you should have been faithful and he would
have extended his arm, and supported you against all the
fiery darts of the adversary; and he would have been with
you in every time of trouble. Behold thou art Joseph, and
thou was chosen to do the work of the Lord, but because of
transgression, if thou art not aware thou wilt fall, but
remember God is merciful: Therefore, repent of that which
thou hast done, and he will only cause thee to be afflicted
for a season, and thou art still chosen, and wilt again be
called to the work: and except thou do this, thou shalt be
delivered up and become as other men, and have no more
gift." (1833 Book of Commandments, Section 2:2-4; see
also Doctrine and Covenants
3:3-11, bold added)
Questions: If this passage is an accurate
representation of God's counsel to Joseph Smith, based upon
Joseph Smith's previous quotes, can it reasonably be argued
that Joseph Smith became a boastful person? If so, then
what should one think of the legitimacy of his continued
spiritual gift or gifts?
|
Other LDS prophets spoke of Joseph Smith in a
similar fashion:
-
"Well, now, examine the character of the
Savior, and examine the character of those who have
written the Old and New Testaments; and then compare them
with the character of Joseph Smith, the founder of this
work... and you will find that his character stands as fair
as that of any man's mentioned in the Bible. We can find no
person who presents a better character to the world when the
facts are known than Joseph Smith, Jun., the prophet and
his brother Hyrum Smith, who was murdered with him." —
President Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol.
14, p. 203 [bold added]
-
"...No man or woman in this dispensation will
ever enter into the celestial kingdom of God without the
consent of Joseph Smith.... Every man and woman must have
the certificate of Joseph Smith, junior, as a passport to
their entrance... I cannot go there without his consent....
He reigns there as supreme a being in his sphere,
capacity, and calling, as God does in heaven." —
President Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol.
7, p. 289 [bold added]
-
"When brother Joseph Smith lived, he was our
Prophet, our Seer, and Revelator; he was our dictator in
the things of God, and it was for us to listen to him, and
do just as he told us. Now that appears very absurd in
the eyes of the world; but they all say, if they had lived
in the days of Peter, Moses, or Jesus, they would not have
done as the people in those days did to them; but at the
same time they would take their lives if they could, and do
just like them." — President Heber C. Kimball, delivered at
the special conference in the Tabernacle, Salt Lake City,
August 13, 1853, Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, p.
106 [bold added]
Questions:
Is it reasonable to assume that God would appoint a man to be
a dictator over his children? Does not the LDS account of the
War in Heaven discuss the defeat of Satan, who aspired to be a
dictator over mankind?
|
A popular LDS hymn, "Praise to the Man,"
endorsed in the official LDS hymn book, also states the
following:
-
"Praise to the man who communed with Jehovah!
Jesus anointed that Prophet and Seer. Blessed to open the
last dispensation, Kings shall extol him, and nations
revere. Hail to the Prophet, ascended to heaven! Traitors
and tyrants now fight him in vain. Mingling with Gods, he
can plan for his brethren; Death cannot conquer the hero
again.
-
"Praise to his mem'ry, he died as a martyr;
Honored and blest be his ever great name! Long shall his
blood, which was shed by assassins, Plead unto heav'n while
the earth lauds his fame. Hail to the Prophet, ascended to
heaven! Traitors and tyrants now fight him in vain. Mingling
with Gods, he can plan for his brethren; Death cannot
conquer the hero again.
-
"Great is his glory and endless his
priesthood. Ever and ever the keys he will hold.
-
"Faithful and true, he will enter his
kingdom, Crowned in the midst of the prophets of old. Hail
to the Prophet, ascended to heaven! Traitors and tyrants now
fight him in vain. Mingling with Gods, he can plan for his
brethren; Death cannot conquer the hero again.
-
"Sacrifice brings forth the blessings of
heaven; Earth must atone for the blood of that man. Wake up
the world for the conflict of justice. Millions shall know
'Brother Joseph' again. Hail to the Prophet, ascended to
heaven! Traitors and tyrants now fight him in vain. Mingling
with Gods, he can plan for his brethren; Death cannot
conquer the hero again." ("Hymns of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-Day Saints," by William W. Phelps, p. 27)
Question:
Is it reasonable to conclude that God would have us celebrate
a mortal's "fame" and "great glory"?
|
Back to Topics
Honors of Men
The last question from the previous section is
amplified by current President Gordon B. Hinckley's public
statement:
-
"Be humble. There is no place for arrogance
in our lives. There is no place for conceit in our lives. There is no place for egotism in our lives. We have work to
do. We have things to accomplish. … ‘Be thou humble; and the
Lord thy God shall lead thee by the hand, and give thee
answer to thy prayers’ (D&C 112:10). People ask me what is
my favorite scripture, and I say I have many of them. But
that is one of them. ‘Be thou humble; and the Lord thy God
shall lead thee by the hand, and give thee answer to thy
prayers’” — Gordon B. Hinckley, from a meeting in Spokane,
Washington, youth and young single adults, 22 Aug. 1999, as
found in "Latter-day
Counsel: Excerpts from Recent Addresses of President Gordon
B. Hinckley," Ensign, March 2001, page 64
Compare this statement with the fact that there
exists a bronze bust of President Hinckley in the LDS
Conference Center in Salt Lake City. His portraits and
pictures are prominently displayed in LDS buildings all over
the world. There exists a 54,000-square foot Gordon B.
Hinckley building on the LDS Brigham Young University-Idaho
campus and the past president of that campus stated to the
press that the building is "a perfect tribute" to President
Hinckley and,
-
"... a legacy and impact on this campus that
will last forever." ("BYU-Idaho building gets Hinckley
name," Deseret News, August 29, 2002)
President Hinckley also frequently attends
banquets and ceremonies hosted in his honor and continually
receives the highest honors, awards, and praise of mankind. Yet, according to the Book of Mormon and New Testament,
Jesus Christ purportedly stated:
-
"Verily, verily, I say that I would that ye
should do alms unto the poor; but take heed that ye do not
your alms before men to be seen of them; otherwise ye have
no reward of your Father who is in heaven. Therefore, when
ye shall do your alms do not sound a trumpet before you, as
will hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets,
that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, they
have their reward. But when thou doest alms let not thy left
hand know what thy right hand doeth; That thine alms may be
in secret; and thy Father who seeth in secret, himself shall
reward thee openly. And when thou prayest thou shalt not do
as the hypocrites, for they love to pray, standing in the
synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may
be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, they have their
reward. But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet,
and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father who is
in secret; and thy Father, who seeth in secret, shall reward
thee openly." (3
Nephi 13:1-6; see also
Matthew 6:1-6)
-
"Ye are they that justify yourselves before
men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly
esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." (Luke
16:15)
-
"Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and
when they shall separate you from their company, and shall
reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of
man's sake. Rejoice ye in that day, and leap for joy: for,
behold, your reward is great in heaven: for in the like
manner did their fathers unto the prophets. But woe unto you
that are rich! for ye have received your consolation. Woe
unto you that are full! for ye shall hunger. Woe unto you
that laugh now! for ye shall mourn and weep. Woe unto you,
when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their
fathers to the false prophets." (Luke
6:22-25)
-
"And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good
Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? And Jesus
said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save
one, that is, God." (Luke
18:18-19)
-
"For the time speedily shall come that all
churches which are built up to get gain, and all those who
are built up to get power over the flesh, and those who are
built up to become popular in the eyes of the world, and
those who seek the lusts of the flesh and the things of the
world, and to do all manner of iniquity; yea, in fine, all
those who belong to the kingdom of the devil, are they who
need fear, and tremble and quake; they are those who must be
brought low in the dust; they are those who must be consumed
as stubble...." (2
Nephi 22:23)
Note: See also
2 Nephi 26:29.
Question:
Is it reasonable to assume that God finds it humble and
acceptable for mortals to accept recognition, honor, and fame
for spiritual services performed in his name and by his power?
|
Back to Topics
For more information on LDS political
involvement, see "Identifying
Political Popery:
A Decade of Reflection".
Sign up!
Receive
free e-mail updates and
share
this information with others.
Copying Permission: Permission to reprint
articles and material in whole or in part is hereby granted provided that
The Helmsman Society is cited. Feel free to share this
information with others.
Disclaimer: The information on this site is for
educational purposes only. If there are mistakes, let me
know so I can correct them at
info@helmsmansociety.com.
Comments or
questions? Email
info@helmsmansociety.com.
Copyright © 2005 The Helmsman Society.
|